Ford Mustang Safety Problems
There is no great reason not to buy a Ford Mustang. I mean, it is the unicorn of cars: neither too big nor small, expensive nor cheap. Showy nor ugly.
These days it even gets good mileage.
Everyone adores Ford Mustang. That is a fact. Some only love the earlier Ford Mustang versions. The Fox body draws others into the Ford Mustang frenzy. It does not matter if you prefer a customized Ford Mustang or museum quality Ford Mustang. Any Ford Mustang has safety problems.
The recent New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), which gives safety ratings, is out. Believe me, the crash testing rating results are not convincing. I have some news for your faithful rear passenger. First, any car can have bad safety ratings.
However, be careful when driving a 45-year-old Ford Mustang on the National Highway. There is a realm of issues.
The 2017 Ford Mustang scored a disastrous two out of five in the NCAP crash test rating. In terms of highway safety, this safety rating made the Ford Mustang the least safe car from a mainstream brand since 2012.
Ford Mustang Classics: An Expensive Casket?
A more in-depth look into the classical Mustangs built from 1964 through 1970 gives some interesting information. For over 30 years, a fire erupted from the trunks of these models spreading into the passenger compartment.
This revelation showed that a rear passenger was at higher risk of more harm if an accident occurred on the national highway. These classical Mustangs have left a trail of death and suffering.
Many Vintage Mustang enthusiasts still will not let these Mustangs go. There are about 1.5 million modified Ford Mustang cars still on the road. Other thousands off the road waiting for repairs and an eventful return to the national highway.
Remembering every one of them carries in the trunk a potentially deadly defect.
Only Downhill From Here
Fast forward to 2017. The independent crash test rating authority classified the Ford Mustang V8- powered version as an affordable sports car but with sub-standard safety. The crash test rating labelled the Ford Mustang GT as unsafe. This crash test rating determined that the driver and the rear passenger in a Mustang were likely to suffer severe injuries in a collision.
In terms of highway safety, a test conducted by Euro NCAP, Australia’s leading independent crash test authority, the ANCAP found the V8-powered model to have inadequate occupant protection for both adults, children, and rear passengers.
They attributed this to:
- poorly inflating airbags;
- a low grade crash structure—that came open in a side pole test; and
- a lack of crash avoidance tech;
ANCAP’s Shocking Position
The Ford Mustang seems to have overlooked many safety measures that come with new cars. This result is shocking for such a newly designed and popular model.
The ANCAP chief executive James Goodwin stated that the Mustang was below expectations of what consumers would expect, and it was not as safe as it should be.
Ford Mustang’s Low Blow Defense
Later, Ford Mustang defended its muscle car, suggesting that there was a new rigorous testing protocol introduced by ANCAP the previous year. This was well after the development of that specific Ford Mustang.
The statement continued to assert that they tailored the ANCAP highway safety tests for family cars and people movers than sports cars like the Ford Mustang.
This suggests that the Ford Mustang meets highway safety standards by using appropriate safety administration techniques. However, the safety ratings and frontal ratings put Ford Mustang in the rear passenger sit of this discussion.
Ford also defended their Mustang from safety problems by adding that it met all applicable safety standards required for highway safety on the National Highway.
They also stated that their Ford Mustang cars performed well in oversees crash testing rating results. These highway safety crash test rating results included those from the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
However, the Ford Mustang safety problems were not because the vehicle was missing minor safety help systems. ANCAP attributed the poor safety ratings to not performing well structurally, which moved it down the pecking order in terms of safety administration and crash test rating.
Appaling Frontal Rating of the Ford Mustang
The Ford Mustang poses a severe risk of leg, head, and chest injuries for rear passengers. The crash test rating also unearthed that there was an insufficient inflation of both driver and passenger airbags.
When exposed to a frontal crash, the dummy driver’s head met the steering wheel. The passenger’s head also met the dashboard. A pole test also revealed that the whiplash protection for rear-end collisions only scored marginally. Bad news for the rear passenger.
What About the Safety Ratings?
The Ford Mustang also performed dismally in the highway safety assist, part of the NCAP test scoring just 16 percent. Child occupant protection was better but still inadequate compared to other brands with 32 percent.
The frontal rating offset test let down the adult highway safety—pushing the score down to 72 percent.
Pedestrian protection was beyond average, earning a safety rating of 64 percent. However, the ANCAP reported that the front edge of the bonnet posed a high injury risk for pedestrians.
Something Ford Mustang should look into in safety administration of future Ford Mustang models.
Owning a Mustang Now
The Ford Mustang’s safety problems, which earned it a two-star rating, are the worst crash test result for a new model since the LDV V80 van in 2013, which earned a similar score.
It seems unlikely that they can resolve Ford Mustang safety problems as part of a recall. Ford Mustang also appears to have no plans to do so.
However, safety features are notable as part of an update in the Ford Mustang 2019 and Ford Mustang 2020 versions, which have scored better in the crash testing rating.
If you are looking to buy in a new Ford Mustang, or replace your unique classic for a more family friendly brand, check my pinned comment for more information.
Feel free to drop your feedback in the comments section below.
Hey, my name is Dan. I used to work at the biggest car dealership in the country and now I teach. Fine folks like you how not to get f•••ed when buying a car. Kind of a cool gig, huh? I know, I know. I was just simply the chosen one. Now, in this video, I want to talk to you about Ford safety. This video will get crazy. I mean, you will have your socks knocked off, literally. You better be prepared. I hope you’re sitting down with multiple pairs of socks by your hand. Just put them on so they can be blown off, literally. This is gonna get crazy. But if you stick through this entire video, what I’m gonna cover, nobody is talking about it in the country road and track Nayda KBB. None of them are going to talk about this. So what’s the best vehicle of choice to mow down crowds of people? Absolutely. Ford got your back and we have a Mustang. Apparently, there are crowds of people in Europe also, and that is why Ford actually started to export Ford Mustang into Europe. Europeans like to have safe cars. In fact, some of their safety features are more strict than America and some of their cars are more friendly for the environment than in America. So those guys know what they’re doing. So the people who are in charge of crashing cars and crash in test dummies are these guys right here and cap and euro and cap.
So this is what they said about front collision with Ford. The fool with frontal test showed the risk of serious head, chest and leg injury to the rear passenger. So for those of you, don’t worry about your arms are going to be just fine. However, your head, chest and legs no go. I’m not going to be using those again after a collision. Here is something else. The drivers had bottomed out the airbag. There was insufficient pressure in the airbag to prevent their head from contacting the steering wheel through the deflated airbag material. The head just went straight through the airbag into the steering wheel. But if you’re a passenger, not to worry, you’re not going to be left alone. The head of the passenger dummy also bottomed out. The airbag against the dashboard all went to the insufficient inflation of the airbag and inadequate and restrained for a larger statures by the passenger seat belt load limiter. That is s••• ton of f•••ing wars. I s••• on. Let me explain what this means. I have hard time reading this mumbo jumbo. What this guy should have said. If you’re driving or you’re the passenger in Mustang and you get in the front collision, you are f•••ed. I don’t understand why they’re using all these complicated words.
You’re f•••ed. Pretty much explains everything. You’re f•••ed. Only two words can put a whole f•••ing summary into two words. They should really they should really start using those two words. They’re really, really magnificent. Here’s some more mumbo jumbo, but I will summarize it for you. The people who were sitting in the backseat of Ford Mustang just slipped under the seat. There are fewer and f•••ing pelvis were crushed to pieces and there is a high chance of your head just breaking off. So whenever you’re waiting for paramedics to come back and put your s••• back together, go ahead, find your skull, put it back on your shoulders and start puzzling. Back your femur and your f•••ing pelvis back together. Thank you, Ford. We’re not done just yet. There is more an important element of euro and kept child safety rating includes elements such as engrossing and aggressing of the child seat area where 2 door coupes have disadvantage. Ford, this is this is what Ford said. Here’s the coolest part. This will blow your f•••ing mind. Are you ready now? This is what euro and kept secretary general said. I quote. Ford did not expect Euro and KAP to test the Mustang and chose not to fit safety technology in Europe. They chose not to equip available safety technology. It’s not that did they didn’t have it. It’s not like it was not invented.
It’s not like this test just jumped out of them and raped them. No, no, no. They knew about this test. They knew exactly what was going to be going on. But they chose to save one hundred, two hundred, three hundred dollars. The only thing I want to ask to CEO, to president of the fourth company. How many hundreds of dollars did you save on each life that was f•••ed up? I want to see how many hundreds of dollars did you save on each motherf•••er that’s laying in a f•••ing coma? How many? Two. Three. Four. Five hundred dollars. How many? That’s the only thing I want to know. I’ll keep reading the quote which was available to the American consumers and available on several are their sports cars for that matter. It was available. It was nothing new. This thing is not a surprise test. They knew the ship would be tested and they removed safety features on those cars. Such attitude to safety should trouble for its customers, whether they’re buying a high powered muscle car or a regular family car. This absolutely blows my mind. Ford removed, purposefully removed safety features from their cars in Europe. What do you think is stopping them from doing the same thing in America if they can save two or three hundred dollars? Do you think they will? Abso f•••ing lutely. They just showed us they will. They showed us that they will save a few hundred dollars not to equip safety features so they can. Save a couple of hundred dollars. That’s it. It’s over a couple of hundred f•••ing dollars. Do you really think Ford did not know that this problem was gonna happen? Do you think they really did not test these vehicles in their own safety facilities? Do you really think they did not do their own testing? They did.
And after that, they still chose not to equip these safety feature features. And what do you think Ford has offered to do? They probably said, you know what? Let’s take these cars back there. We f•••ed up. We’re very sorry. Here’s your money. And some you know what? We’re going to put new technological features in cars. We’re going to put new safety features in cars. You know what? We’re gonna put a f•••ing roll bar roll cage in your car. You know what? We’re going to put better airbags. We’re going to put better seatbelts. We’re gonna fix this s•••. No, they didn’t do any of that. Unlike any other car reviewer or person that talks about cars or just makes video about cars. Because I am not getting paid by dealerships. I’m not getting paid by advertising companies. I am not getting paid by car manufacturers. I can tell Ford to go f••• themselves unlike any body else. NATO can do that. KBB can’t do that. Road and track. Can’t do that. Consumer Reports can’t do that. Nobody can do that because they will lose their f•••ing money. Now, I want to talk to the dad whose fault this is. Are you ready? No, it’s not the CEO of Ford. It’s not the engineers. It’s not the vice president. It’s not the president. It’s not the owners. It’s not the designers.
It’s not the people that are in charge of safety. Because none of them have your best interests in their mind. None of them. Their only responsibility when they go to work, when they show up in the office at 8 o’clock. Their only job is to make money. That is the only job. It’s your fault for going and buy new cars. It is a 100 percent your fault for going to a dealership and giving these motherf•••ers your money. When you’re going to a dealership and you’re buying a s••• box for 50, 40, 30, 20 thousand dollars with markups that are absolutely insane. You are giving these companies your money. You’re not telling them to go out and do their best. You’re not asking them to do their best. You’re asking for your football team to do their best. You want your f•••ing baseball team, your your sports team to do their best. Imagine if football played like this. Imagine if football was getting played, how it was getting played in 1950. Imagine if they were using the same s••• from 1970s and 1990s. Would you watch that? Would absolutely not. No, you wouldn’t. Because you’re expecting for that person on the field to do their god damn best if they’re breaking their f•••ing bones. You want them to do their best. We’re not expecting to do the same thing from car manufacturers that have our lives at stake. Are you serious? We fail to take responsibility for our actions when we are buying cars. What will happen to car manufacturers, to Ford shavings, Hondas, Nissans, Bentleys? I don’t give a s••• what would would happen if all of a sudden their sales dropped by 50 percent overnight.
Do you think we might be getting cars that have a little better miles per gallon? Do you think we will have cars with more features that are standard? Do you think we would even have optional features? I don’t think so. Do you think car safety would probably increase abso f•••ing lutely? The reason they’re being so lazy and uncaring about us is because we’re on their dick sucking it gladly. For shady cars. That’s the bottom line. It is our responsibility. Hold on, I’m gonna show you something. We’re not done just yet. I covered this, but I’m going to go over it again just in case you haven’t seen my other videos. UBS electronic braking system, which saves 40 percent of people from dining car crashes, was invented in nineteen ninety five standard feature in 2012. For 17 years, people were dying for no reason, for no reason. Just so manufacturers could make some extra money selling new cars after you get into a car accident. The first modern and forward collision avoidance system was demonstrated in nineteen ninety five. This was available on the Toyota, which in our days costs about ninety thousand dollars in nineteen ninety five. It was first revealed it was invented in nineteen ninety seven. It was first used by Toyota on the car that costs like ninety thousand dollars. Our money these days. In 2018, we still do not have collision prevention systems on every single f•••ing car. A lot of you are thinking that these multi billion dollar corporations have your best interests in their mind.
If Coke, Ford, Shavit, Dow Company, Chase Bank or any part or any person can make some extra money by working with f•••ing Nazis, you think they are going to care about your safety? If I sound a little f•••ing angry, I am. If I sell man, I am. I can’t. I can’t make f•••ing videos about cars. I used to love cars. Anybody that knows me. Used to used to think of me as a car guy. And I loved cars. I eat slept f•••ing pissed cars. I loved cars. But once I started to do more research and not being impressed by airbags that were available in 50s, in 50s, airbags were available in 50s, they were only standard teacher in 1998 for 40 or 50, almost 50 years. People were dying because of lack of airbags, because car companies wanted to make some extra money. Here is something I want you to leave this video with. OK. There is not a day when the car manufacturer or a multi-billion dollar corporation has your best interest in your safety over their profits. Not one day when we are spending our money on s••• products and I talk about cars, but this applies to everything. When we are spending our money on s••• cars, on products that are unsafe, the product, the car manufacturers that are refused to give us better mpg. Did you know there there is a car? This is for real. I’m going to I’m going to show you this video. Just watch it. OK. It will blow your f•••ing mind.
This is the Opel P1 experimental car, much like it was in its day when it was used. It still has the same paintwork, still the same complicated stickers on it. It’s very, very original. I bought it because I think it’s a milestone and I think it represents kind of where the world has been and where the world is going on. The test track in nineteen seventy three came in at three hundred seventy six miles per gallon.
Do you think about that video? Pretty crazy, huh? And Tesla and Toyota telling us how great they are, how amazing Toyota Priuses at 50 miles a gallon. Holy s•••. What a technological advancement. Wow. They are stretching the limits of a human imagination. They’re doing something crazy. Really? They’re doing something crazy. That car got almost four f•••ing hundred miles. To a gallon, yes, it was on the track. Yes, it wasn’t the track. Yes, it was a specially built vehicle. Can we get a quarter of that? Can we get a quarter of that? I’m not asking for four hundred miles to a gallon. Can we get a quarter of that? Can we get a sixth of that? Can we get at least 70 miles to a gallon of regular cars? Can we have 40, 50 miles per gallon on trucks? Really? We haven’t invented anything new regarding combustion engines since the very beginning. The technological advancement and combustion engine is absolutely slow. They’re nonexistent. Mosby’s trying to do something right now. But again, they’re being slow as hell. All right. I think I’m done here. If you’re ever thinking about buying a car brand, you please don’t. Please do a lot of research before you buy a car. And that’s what I do. And that’s why I created a 60 minute car, because I was tired of salesmen and car manufacturers lying in scamming regular people. If you want, check out my Web site. I teach people how to buy cars without getting f•••ed or if you don’t have time to search for a car. Hell, I’ll find you a car. This is Dan with 60 minute car. I’m signing out. And if I’m not sleeping at the bottom of the ocean this night or I’m not getting eaten by worms or taking a bath in hydrochloric acid. I’ll see you on the Internet.